Skip to content

Dust Bunny knows best (part one)

I shall now bang out some words and call it fiction. Don’t think that this opening  paragraph is some kind of pomo meta-narrative conceit. It isn’t.  This is just a way of focusing my mind on the task at hand. And a way to suggest that something different might be taking place within the blog. My PhD supervisor complained that he didn’t think this blog was focused enough on a single topic, so even though I’m no longer doing the PhD this is a short bit of prose to help him understand what’s about to take place. Sometimes you have to help academics out.

He scrawled his fingers though the dust that had built up at the side of his keyboard. How long had it been since a cloth had scrapped away the detritus of flaky skin and dust mites?

By the way, this is the start of the story now. I’ve stopped talking about academics. Although, having written that, I wonder if I’ll make this character an academic? So far all I’ve got in my mind is something about diarrhea and household dust!

Dust bunny knows bestHe staggered his finger to a stop and noted the short, jittery lines he’d marked out. There was something there, something deep and insightful. Something lurking just at the edges of his awareness. He stared at them, wondering if he could just unlock whatever it was through sheer determination.

No, nothing was coming through. Maybe it was only dust after all and not a message from the great beyond? Like a wise and worldly sage, he stroked his chin and passed judgement on the patterns. He would wipe them up with his new dust bunny cleaning cloth. That would do the trick. Besides, he needed to go to the kitchen to see what food he had in. He was supposed to be having a ‘friend’ around for dinner tonight.

“What do women eat on dates?” he asked the sink as he ducked down to pull out a cleaning cloth. He slipped the bunny shaped flannel onto his hand and repeated the question. The bunny looked him up and down and raised its arms in resignation. It had no idea. “Thanks, Bunny.” He’d show Bunny who knew best once he’d washed its face in the sea of dust across his desk.

With the office/spare room tidied and a quick Google search for dinner suggestions completed, he prepared a list of ingredients. Apparently ladies didn’t eat pizza and beer when on a date (according to one website). However, there was no definitive answer to what they did like to eat. He had settled on something by Jamie Oliver: Paella. He was pretty sure that Jamie hadn’t invented the recipe, but it looked like a good version of it. Besides, Jamie reckoned that, “the combination of textures and smoky flavours completely won me over.” If it did that for a cook, imagine what it might do for a lady on a date?

“Dust Bunny, I think that tonight might just be…” Dust Bunny looked at him from the end of his wrist. There was something doubting and uncertain in those black, glaring eyes. “Well, what the hell do you know?” And Dust Bunny spun away into a corner of the room, slipping under a precarious tower of magazines and towels in the corner. He turned his hand around before him as though he had never seen it before. Bereft of faux-rabbit pelt, it felt clean and fresh again. The sort of free and fresh hand that might prepare a lovely paella meal for two.

Dust Bunny knows best (part two)–>>>

Ignore this, it’s just a typing exercise

I’ve had so much stuff to blog about recently that it’s almost unbearable to have to withhold it from you (you being the me of the future who will one day read these entries). And withhold it I shall, and not because of any secretive, or carefully contrived, pre-emptive of some event type of withhold, but the most basic of a writer’s refusals to empart* some nugget of information. Namely, I can’t be arsed to type it out. Woo, take that future me.

If I withhold something from the Internet, has it really happened?

Errr, so there’s a lot happening in politics at the moment….. yeah, not got much on that. Did I mention that I put in a proposal to True/Slant, to write a blog about the British political battle currently being waged across our media? Oh yeah, there’s a political battle for the number one spot, to be the CEO of England. In a nutshell, what happens is that the one who is the most media-savvy gets to run the country for four years. I know, weird isn’t it? Imagine if you let someone run a massive multi-national company, not because they really knew about business, but because they knew how to create a shit storm** in the multi-channel media world? Oh, right yeah, Steve Jobs or Richard Branson. So anyway, that’ll be fun. My pitch was to cover the British political system as a non-savvy political pundit. Kind of digging in and seeing what it’s all about.

As it is, I’m reduced to making snide comments on Facebook and Twitter. But that’s where it’s at these days, right kids?

Right, as Capote said about Kerouac: that’s not writing it’s typing. So, I’ll stop tapping away now.

p.s. read the footnotes below, they’re really compelling and contextualise everything!

*Firefox is saying that empart is spelled incorrectly. I can’t be bothered to go to Dictionary.com and check, but I’m happy to accept responsibility if I’ve accidentally created a new word.

**Shit storm? No, I’ve no idea why I’m using that phrase. Sound cool though eh, scatologists.

A stopped online magazine is right twice a day

That’s a ridiculous title for a blog post! I was never very good at headlines when I was editing ‘my’ magazine. I didn’t have the flair for the level of cheese that the industry specific title required.  But I digress.

You know how your favourite online literary magazine was always 3ammagazine? And you wished you could share some of that avant-garde-like coolness with your kids (or other people’s kids. No wait, that might go the wrong way) Well, now you can, because Andrew Gallix and co have invented 3pmmagazine. You see, it’s during the day, because that’s when kids are awake, rather than drug-adled lovers of the kind of stuff that the grown up version publishes. Also, it’s close to the time of day that kids leave school, but that may be less relevant?

Which is why my title is long and still cohesively relevant. I think?

The films of the book

Carlos Castenedas book coverRemember when you were younger and you went into that second-hand bookshop near the university and bought that book by Carlos Castaneda called Journey to Ixtlan? Yeah, the hardback one without a cover. Just gray and really old looking, even then. In it, Castaneda narrates his anthropological studies under a Mexican shaman. The books are actually quite witty and a pleasure to read, regardless of what the ‘spiritual message’ might be and whatever you might decide to make of the legitimacy of some of his claims (I’ll give you a clue: he was probably a little nuts). What I took away from the books was a sense that reality, the one we occupy and move through, can be just as mystical and bizarre and amazing, without needing to impose any alternative agency on it. Just everyday behaviours can be, well amazing. And that shamen can be fun-loving tricksters when they put their minds to it.

The Great Drinking Bout

The Great Drinking Bout

The current exhibition by João Maria Gusmão and Pedro Paiva at Ikon Gallery in Birmingham reminds me of the writing of Carlos Castaneda. One of the films on show (which you first see when going to the exhibition) is The Great Drinking Bout which shows some men sitting around, passing a pot of liquid around and taking a sip. The pot is eventually put on the head of the leader who then guides the others around the forest. It’s all good fun and a bit wacky – probably just the sort of thing any of us would do after a few pints and too much time on our hands. Fuck knows, it would help to liven up a night out in Coventry city centre!

Then there’s Columbo’s Column. A bearded man tries (and succeeds) in building a column out of eggs, stacked one on top of the other. And who hasn’t tried a similiar trick on pancake day, eh? If you know the apocryphal tale of Christopher Columbus, the egg and discovering the Americas (“It’s easy when you know how”) then it’ll make sense. And if you don’t it’s good to watch anyway.

Everyday activities pulled out of the mundane and ritualised. There’s the trickster element to all of the works presented here that hints at playful attempts to disrupt our desperate desire to make sense of a world that ultimately doesn’t give a shit about us. Not in a bad way, the ID just doesn’t care, does it?

But I tell you who does care about your existence: curators and gallery owners, that’s who! So go along to the Ikon and see the works for yourself. You’ll be glad you did, honest. It’s on from 3 February – 21 March 2010 in the First Floor Galleries.

Art eh? bloody brilliant ain’t it?

Well well well, I was hoping never to have to do much more than recycle second-hand stories from the web in an attempt to appear knowledgeable and well-traveled in the art world. And then I accidentally end up in London and go to two galleries! I know, amazing eh? Jerry Saltz had better watch his step, as far as I’m concerned. And fuck, it’s a right bore having to actually trundle across town and look at the art! Surely there’s an iPhone App that does it for you? And the time, Jesus Christ, it takes so long to get through to the gift shop. Why can’t they put the gift shop at the start so you can just get on with buying tea towels and mugs? Oh yeah, the V&A does do that. Well good for them! So, I went along to the V&A, to see their Decode exhibition and then Tate Britain. To be honest, I was only going to Tate Britain to meet someone.

The Decode exhibition was interesting. If you’ve flirted outrageously (in a binary kind of way) on the edges of the media arts scene and are a fan of… for example Furtherfield, then you’re probably going to feel as though you have a slight vested interest in digital art. Which means that you’re inclined to approach an exhibition at a ‘major’ gallery/museum with a certain trepidation. Are they going to respect the history and hard work of all the other people and institutions that have been doing this ‘stuff’ for years, or are they going to do what Martin Amis did with sci-fi and Philip K Dick when he wrote Time’s Arrow, and take a massive shit all over what already exists and pretend they’ve invented the genre?

I think they’ve done alright actually (the V&A, not Amis. But he’s okay at times as well). There’s a few of the big names in there, like Joshua Davis and Golan Levin. And they have Stanza’s work in there (which, ahem, I reviewed last year. I like to imagine it’s my review that encouraged them to exhibit his work… ahh vanity though art mine only friend).  So yeah, it’s not so bad. Charlotte Frost has written a good review of it, and Rob Myer will be doing one for Furtherfield soon.

After the V&A, I went along to Tate Britain and hung about the bookshop and outside the Chris Ofili exhibition. By all accounts, it’s pretty good and shows much of his mid-nineties work, as well as his latest stuff. I just took some photos of the gifts. Guy Debord, yeah? I think we all know what I’m saying.

Art competition: wow!

Worcester Art Gallery competition
Worcester City Art Gallery are co-hosting the latest Worcester Open Exhibition. It has been said in some quarters that any competition that you have to pay for isn’t necessarily one that you should enter. There are, however, many different reasons for organisations charging for entry.

If you think it’s not such a bad idea then you should go for it and cough up the entry fee of, “£15 for three works (at least one will be selected for inclusion)” which will cover, “administration, professional development and is non-refundable”

In collaboration with Worcestershire Contemporary Artists and the PITT Studio, Worcester City Art Gallery will be co-hosting the fourth Worcester Open Exhibition.

As well as exhibiting work from practicing artists in the West Midlands and the rest on the UK, the Open will support professional arts development in the region through a range of additional opportunities and events. The exhibition is not themed but will be exploring the methods of selection and curatorial processes associated with Open type exhibitions and the role of mentor and protégé in visual art galleries.

Walsall, it’s not just about the chip shops

Hey, who says there isn’t interesting stuff going on outside of London? Nobody, that’s who (but I wish people would start that argument up again, just because it unnerves liberal minded Londoners) And as though to prove the point The New Art Gallery Walsall is celebrating ten years of being open this February. To go along with this anniversary there’s going to be a party. Or rather, an exhibition that’s like a party. Except nobody gets to sleep with the drunk girl in the bathroom and god-forbid anyone spews up in the plant pots.

Ten artists were invited to send them birthday cards. Great!

I like the Walsall Art Gallery. It’s galleries always feel open and spacious, allowing whatever they have on exhibition to ‘breath’ within the rooms. The exhibitions I’ve seen there have been good (I can’t remember much more other than that.) I should go along again while I’ve got some time on my hands.

Coincidentally, Capsule have also just celebrated their tenth anniversary. Must have been something in the Midlands air ten years ago! I’ll write something in a future post about Capsule’s interesting thing they’ve got planned. Compelling eh?

March issue of Art Review

Art Review March 2010The March issue of Art Review will be landing in your local newsagent soon. Just there, between the design magazines and the latest issue of What Dog Monthly featuring a hundred things to do with a poodle when it starts to lose it’s fur. Great. Well, if you can pull your nose out of the dog magazines long enough to show an interest in art, then this issue has Bharti Kher on it’s front cover, with even more words about her on the inside. Magazines are great aren’t they?

So go buy it. Guaranteed to contain slightly less pictures of dogs than What Dog Monthly.

Blog posts or blogs?

I so wish that I’d managed to keep my old database and entries to previous blogs. Oh hang on, before  ramble on, I’d just like to say that I really hate  it when people talk about blogging and say that they’ve just written a blog, when they mean a blog post. It’s like being a newspaper columnist and saying I’m going to write a newspaper. When you mean an article. You’re confusing the medium with… errrr a section of the medium. You know what I mean.

Wish I’d kept my old blog entries. Or should I say my old blogs, like those idiots referenced above? If I had I wouldn’t have to worry that the tone of this new blog (and it’s posts) would take me off in a scary new direction that may one day result in me a) not getting some work and b) getting the sack from somewhere when they read this blog and it’s posts. (See what I did there? Yeah I differentiated between the two things).

An unremittingly dull and vacuous text

This is a new blog of mine, since I destroyed my previous one with a horrible accident involving databases and Drupal and other bad stuff that shouldn’t have happened. That’s not a very good advert for my skills with CMSs and databases I know, but it was me experimenting so that I don’t have to do it on other people’s websites. So, what I’m saying is, don’t panic about it. it’ll be okay. Please give me a job.

Right, so this blog now is (probably) going to be about art and art writing. Well, I guess most blogs are about writing aren’t they? Still, as someone who has earned a bit of a living as a writer or editor for a few years now, I thought that talking about my interests in art and additional stuff (yeah, I said stuff) would encourage me to write more. And to think about it. I’m sure there’s more than that, but I can’t think of anything right now.